Cross Border Data Transfers Under DPDPA: Navigating the Blacklist Approach
An examination of India approach to international data transfers under DPDPA 2023, contrasting with GDPR adequacy decisions and analysing implications for multinational organisations.
AMLEGALS Research Team
Legal Research & Analysis
The Blacklist Paradigm
Section 16 of DPDPA 2023 establishes India approach to cross border data transfers through a "blacklist" mechanism. Unlike the GDPR which operates on an "adequacy" or "whitelist" model requiring positive determination before transfers are permitted, DPDPA permits transfers to all jurisdictions except those specifically restricted by Central Government notification.
This represents a fundamentally permissive approach, meaning that absent specific restriction, personal data may flow freely to any jurisdiction. As of February 2026, the Central Government has not published any restricted countries list under Section 16(1).
Comparison with GDPR Transfer Mechanisms
| Aspect | DPDPA 2023 | GDPR |
|---|---|---|
| Default Position | Permitted | Restricted |
| Mechanism | Blacklist (prohibited countries) | Whitelist (adequacy decisions) + safeguards |
| SCCs Required | Not mandated | Required for non adequate countries |
| Regulatory Burden | Lower | Higher |
Implications for Multinational Operations
The permissive transfer regime under DPDPA offers significant operational flexibility for multinational organisations. Key implications include:
- Cloud Infrastructure: No immediate restrictions on use of global cloud service providers, enabling continued use of distributed infrastructure
- Group Data Sharing: Intra group transfers to overseas affiliates permitted without additional transfer mechanism requirements
- Outsourcing: Engagement of overseas service providers for data processing remains permissible
- Regulatory Monitoring: Organisations must monitor for any Section 16(1) notifications restricting specific jurisdictions
Potential Future Restrictions
Section 16(1) empowers the Central Government to restrict transfers to any country or territory outside India based on relevant factors. Potential triggers for restriction include:
- Geopolitical considerations and bilateral relations
- Lack of adequate data protection framework in recipient jurisdiction
- Concerns regarding government access to data
- National security considerations
Practical Recommendation
Organisations should maintain data flow mapping identifying all cross border transfers, enabling rapid compliance adjustment should any jurisdiction be restricted.
Sectoral Considerations
Certain sectors may face additional data localisation requirements independent of DPDPA:
- Financial Services: RBI circular requiring payment data storage in India (system data localisation)
- Telecommunications: Sectoral regulations may impose location requirements
- Healthcare: Specific health data regulations may evolve
Organisations must consider both DPDPA and sectoral regulations when structuring cross border data flows.
Conclusion
India blacklist approach under Section 16 currently provides substantial flexibility for international data transfers. However, the statutory framework permits rapid restriction of any jurisdiction through Central Government notification. Prudent organisations should maintain comprehensive data flow documentation and establish contingency planning for potential jurisdictional restrictions whilst benefiting from the current permissive regime.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.